Hate in the World - 2

In last part of Hate in the World we read about how the Super powered countries like USA, USSR, and Britain had created two most violent borders in the world without being credited for that mistake that they made just to satisfy their ego and greed. If you have not read the first part of this series of articles then click here to read it.

In this part of the article, the regional powered countries' role in the violence will be discussed. This includes the role of India in the civil wars of Sri Lanka, problems created in middle east by the race of superiority between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and the killing of innocents in Vietnam war because of USA. These three incidents will be discussed here in this article. If you think we are missing out something then let me know that in the comments section. Let's read it;

Blunder in Sri Lankan Civil War -

Unlike other violence acts, in  this event the country which was responsible for the violence was blamed from then to now. When the civil war broke out in Sri Lanka between the LTTE and the Sri Lankan Army, Sri Lanka asked the help of India for controlling the violence and India then ruled by Mr. Rajiv Gandhi sent troops to Sri Lanka which were called India Peace Keeping Forces. The IPKF was sent to maintain the peace in the neighbouring country but it led to many small wars between the native Sri Lankans and the Indian Forces which not only disturbed the peace but also caused lots of casualties. This created a negative image of India in the minds of Sri Lankan people and led to the assassination of the then PM of India Mr. Rajiv Gandhi and also to some disputes between the two countries. People even after so many years hate each other and the best example of this hate is that Sri Lankan players are banned to play in Tamil Nadu during any international or national level game event, like the Sri Lankan players were not allowed to play in the Chennai Stadium during IPL this year.

But now the most important question is how much India should be blamed for this incident and violence in the Sri Lanka, and the answer is that wherever there was battle between the LTTE and IPKF occurred, at all those places it was completely India's mistake and if India wished it could have ignored the violence. The main motive of India was to create the supremacy in the land rather than settling down the events and to show their supremacy they fought against the Sri Lankans which they should have avoided in all the cases and only then they would have called the Indian Peace Keeping Forces. And India failed to do that and the result had created a bit of tension between Sri Lanka and India and also led to some tensions in the Tamil region of India. And of course India is blamed for it's actions in Sri Lanka which created more violence in Sri Lanka rather than peace.

Tension in Middle East -

The fight of supremacy in the middle east between Saudi Arabia and Iran had made it worse to live in some parts of it and the three most affected countries are Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. Currently, Iraq has been suffering from war between Iraqi forces and ISIS, while Syria is witnessing civil war and Yemen had been put into Yemen war. Both Saudi Arabia and Iran are in cold war since the late 20th century and both the countries want the total control of the middle east region. Iran while exported it's idea of revolution to Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan to overthrow their rulers and set a shia rule in the country which had created the much know shia-sunni conflict in the middle east which gave rise to the groups like ISIS, Al-queda, Boko-Haram, etc. which are now violating the region of middle east which has led to the three current wars in the Middle east region. On the other hand Saudi Arabia supported Sadam Husain to invade Iran in the year 1980 and in order to get the control of the Middle east. Nearly a million of people died in that war in which Iraq was backed by Saudi Arabia creating much rage in shais and sunnis against each other. And even now when all the middle east countries are suffering from civil war or some kind of violence, Saudi and Iran are fighting proxy wars against each other in these regions. The Syrian war, Iraqi war and many other terrorist activities are backed by either of the country in order to get the control of the region. Thus the Saudi and Iran are mainly responsible for the wars and violence in many middle east countries and yet not blamed for what they are doing. And if Saudi and Iran stop funding and backing the militant groups in the regions, the situation will get better but Saudi and Iran are in greed of getting the control of the region and thus does not want to stop as it is not their people who are being killed by these militant groups.

Case of Vietnam War -