Unlike other violence acts, in  this event the country which was responsible for the violence was blamed from then to now. When the civil war broke out in Sri Lanka between the LTTE and the Sri Lankan Army, Sri Lanka asked the help of India for controlling the violence and India then ruled by Mr. Rajiv Gandhi sent troops to Sri Lanka which were called India Peace Keeping Forces. The IPKF was sent to maintain the peace in the neighbouring country but it led to many small wars between the native Sri Lankans and the Indian Forces which not only disturbed the peace but also caused lots of casualties. This created a negative image of India in the minds of Sri Lankan people and led to the assassination of the then PM of India Mr. Rajiv Gandhi and also to some disputes between the two countries. People even after so many years hate each other and the best example of this hate is that Sri Lankan players are banned to play in Tamil Nadu during any international or national level game event, like the Sri Lankan players were not allowed to play in the Chennai Stadium during IPL this year.

But now the most important question is how much India should be blamed for this incident and violence in the Sri Lanka, and the answer is that wherever there was battle between the LTTE and IPKF occurred, at all those places it was completely India's mistake and if India wished it could have ignored the violence. The main motive of India was to create the supremacy in the land rather than settling down the events and to show their supremacy they fought against the Sri Lankans which they should have avoided in all the cases and only then they would have called the Indian Peace Keeping Forces. And India failed to do that and the result had created a bit of tension between Sri Lanka and India and also led to some tensions in the Tamil region of India. And of course India is blamed for it's actions in Sri Lanka which created more violence in Sri Lanka rather than peace.

The fight of supremacy in the middle east between Saudi Arabia and Iran had made it worse to live in some parts of it and the three most affected countries are Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. Currently, Iraq has been suffering from war between Iraqi forces and ISIS, while Syria is witnessing civil war and Yemen had been put into Yemen war. Both Saudi Arabia and Iran are in cold war since the late 20th century and both the countries want the total control of the middle east region. Iran while exported it's idea of revolution to Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan to overthrow their rulers and set a shia rule in the country which had created the much know shia-sunni conflict in the middle east which gave rise to the groups like ISIS, Al-queda, Boko-Haram, etc. which are now violating the region of middle east which has led to the three current wars in the Middle east region. On the other hand Saudi Arabia supported Sadam Husain to invade Iran in the year 1980 and in order to get the control of the Middle east. Nearly a million of people died in that war in which Iraq was backed by Saudi Arabia creating much rage in shais and sunnis against each other. And even now when all the middle east countries are suffering from civil war or some kind of violence, Saudi and Iran are fighting proxy wars against each other in these regions. The Syrian war, Iraqi war and many other terrorist activities are backed by either of the country in order to get the control of the region. Thus the Saudi and Iran are mainly responsible for the wars and violence in many middle east countries and yet not blamed for what they are doing. And if Saudi and Iran stop funding and backing the militant groups in the regions, the situation will get better but Saudi and Iran are in greed of getting the control of the region and thus does not want to stop as it is not their people who are being killed by these militant groups.

India and Pakistan probably the most hated countries hated among each other, and the reason for this hate is not Mr. Jinnah or Mr. Nehru but the England, and we know this but even then we hate each other as the nations and always pay homage to England that they had created us, but it should be like this that people for both the countries love each other because they were one at some times but were separated just by the bloody politics and the British should be kept reminded that it is because of them that we are separated from each other and had suffered the blood stains the wars and mass riots during and after the partition. Well, even some say that the it were Nehru and Jinnah who created this partition, well said, they were responsible but how much, they played role in the plan set by the Britain. Why Britain will have done that? just because they did not want to leave such a great resource of wealth and thought that if they will make the people hate each other then it will be hard for the respective governments to rule their countries and will ask them to rule them again. Also, the Britain should be blamed because they were the one who were ruling the Indian Subcontinent at that time and it was there responsibility to make sure that partition should not occur at any condition. See there is certainly never one reason for an event to occur, there are some set of reasons for the occurrence of every event and Britain was one among many reasons for the partition, and if even Britain would not have supported the partition then that mass killing of people during forced migration and during wars between both the countries.

With growing power of North Korea, the country fearing the most is the USA and of course it should be frightened, very much frightened because the whole violence and war in the Korean peninsula occurred because of the ego fight between two countries i.e. USA and USSR. It were these two countries who fought the real war at the land that did not belong to them and by the men which were not there but even then it was exhibition of power of these two countries. It was there ego and the race of superiority which led to mass destruction in the Korean peninsula. And if both these countries would not have supported then the DMZ would not be present and with the DMZ the hate was also not there that exists among the people of both the sides. And we should not forget the role of China in the creation of this worlds most sensitive border. So, it was because of these three super powered countries that the world faced the worst war and the most deadliest border of all time DMZ. If there was no such race of superiority between the USA and the USSR then we would not have seen the DMZ and the obsession of North Korea with mass destruction weapons. That race of superiority and the nuclear weapons in the hands of North Korea had brought the world near the Third World War.

So, we got the set of reasons for the DMZ and the unrest in the Korean peninsula and one of them is the obsession  of North Korea for war and the other is the race of superiority between USA and USSR during the mid 20th century.

So we have discussed that who were mainly responsible for the hate among the countries and the violent borders at various places. There is lot more in the later parts of this Hate in the World series. Hope you guys would have liked the points discussed in this articles. Also you want to know about any other event related to history and current situations you can ask me in the comments section below. Also do read our other articles and subscribe to our blog and share these articles as much as possible.

Hope you guys would have loved the article, for the next article of this series of articles click here.

This happened soon after the death of Aurangzeb as his successor was Shah Alam 1 but the main power of administration was in the hands of his noble 'Wazir Zulfiqar', this led to the emergence of new power centre and the Rulers became more dependent on their nobles for decisions rather than relying on their own decisions. This thing kept on increasing with time and the complete power was shifted from Kings' hand to the Nobles which were not accountable to the people and were always keen to make a handsome profit for them which resulted in the decline in economy and the empire both. If the rulers were independent just like their forefathers they might have changed the situation and could have even terminated the decline of the Mughal Empire.

Mughals were known for their large empire and thus generated large taxes from that area but with time and the decline in the power of the kings, many other rulers set themselves free from the Mughal rule which were concurred by the starting rulers and also many autonomous states started emerging from the Empire like Deccan, Avadh, and Bengal set themselves free from the Mughal Empire which not only reduced the area of the empire but also the resources and the taxes of that region. This emergence of the small autonomous states weakened the Mughal Empire from inside and thus played a great role in the decline of the Mughal Empire.

This reason might be considered as a bit wired but you know what this also played an important role in the shrinking of the Empire. This happened in this way that the rulers before respected the culture and the religion of the native people which created a nice image in the hearts of the people. But the later rulers like after Aurangzeb did not respected the native peoples' religion which led to many rebels in the state and eventually many region set them free from the Mughal empire and merged in their ethnic empire like many regions joined Marathas, while some joined the Sikh empire and in same way many other regions were separated from the Mughal Empire which also played a great role in the decline.

One of the most important reason for the decline of the Mughal rule is the uncertainty that who is the king as the throne was much unstable as some of the rulers were killed by their own nobles while some died soon after their succession which led to the conflict in the royal family and thus there was no time for the external matters to look after for. We can say that during that time the focus was on the throne rather than the problems of people and the attacks from neighbours. Also the age at which the kings succeed the throne was too late and at such late age they were not as effective as it was needed to rule such a kingdom.

And this is the reason because of which the Mughal empire finally came to end and much of the royal family members were killed. This happened in the return of the support showed by Bahadur Shah to the rebellions of the 1857 revolt. When the rebellions approached the king for support, he agreed and supported them but this led to the end of the Mughal Empire and deportation of Bahadur Shah to Rangoon. Thus, the support showed by the king led to the complete end of the Mughal Empire and also the British people became the official ruler of the Indian Subcontinent.

So, these all are the major reasons for the fall of the Mughal Empire. This is just a reason point of the end of Mughal empire, the whole story will be updated soon.

If this is my first article that you are reading I will suggest you to read a few more that you might like them.

Read about the rock art paintings of bhimbetka at Rock art paintings.

Also check my article on the Harappan Culture at 1. harappan-civilization-compared-to.html
                                                                                 2.indus-culture-and-modern-urbanisation.
                                                                                 3.religion-of-harappan-people.